DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagoðeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
ŠUMARSKI LIST 11-12/2006 str. 57 <-- 57 --> PDF |
K. Krapinec, M. Grubešiæ, V. Šegrt, K. Marièiæ: TROFEJNI PARAMETRI MUFLONA . Šumarski list br. 11–12, CXXX (2006), 523-531 mon musimon P.) für die Güteklassenbeurtei-Piegert, H., W. Uloth, 2000: Der Europäische lung. Z. Jagdwiss., 38: 22–216. Mufflon. 1. Auflage, DSV-Verlag GmbH, Ham Markov, G., I. Petrov, 1990. Vergleichsanalyse der burg 258 p. Trophäen des europäischen Mufflons (Ovis am-Regnier, K., 1936: Schneckenformen der Muffelmon musimon Pallas, 1811). Z. Jagdwiss. 36, widder. Wild und Hund, 42 (35):589–593. 151–159. Sabadoš, K., 1974. Kvatitativny a kvalitativny vývoj M ol n á r, A., 1988: Morphological characteristics for muflónej zveri na Slovensku. Pol. Zbornik 4. the mufflon population of the Buda-mountains. Stubbe, C., K. Uhlenhaut, 1970: Kraniologische Valdbiológia 2, 157–167. Untersuchungen am Harzer Muffelwild – Ovis Nahlik, A., 1989a: Succes of some recent moufflon ammon musimon (Pallas, 1811). Beiträge zur populations established in the Transdanubian Jagd-und Wildforschung, 7: 143–156. mountains on the basis of trophy parameters. Telle, R., 1979: Untersuchungen zu ausgewählten Vadiológia, 3:102–115. Problemen der Bewirtschaftung des Muffelwil- Nahlik, A., 1989b: Evaluation of trophy data concerdes in der DDR. Tharandt, Dissertation. ning some of our bigger Hungarian moufflon Telle, R., 1984: Wertung ausgewählter Ansprachmerkpopulations. Erdészeti és Faipari Tudományos male an der Trophäe des Muffelwildes. Waldbio- Közlemények, 1: 145–186. logie und Wildbewirtschaftung 3. 340–348. Pfeffer, P., 1967: Le Mouflon de Corse (Ovis ammon Vari æ a k , V., 1997: Ocjenjivanje lovaèkih trofeja; Eumusimon Schreber, 1782), position systemati-roteam d.o.o.; Zagreb; 176 pp. que, ecologie et ethologie comparées – Mammalia (Suppl.), 31, 262 pp. SUMMARY: The paper analyses the interaction of measuring elements in mouflon trophies, as well as horn growth in length and circumference, and compares it with some Central European and Corsican populations. In terms of mouflon horn element evaluation from the hunting ground “Kalifront”, the highest correlation with age was displayed horn length (r = 0.83), circumference in the third horn section nn ( ((r = 83) and the overall trophy value (r = y v 0.82). The overall trophy value is ss most affected by horn length (r = 0.98), folr i n le lowed by horn circumference in the third horn section ( ((r = 0.91). The second horn section shows slightly less correlation with trophy values and circumference, or horn span (r = 0.82) and curvature. The curve of horn circumference increase from the Rab population in the first four years shows great similarity to the curve of the Slovak population. Together, they have higher values than other populations. However, unlike the Rab population, the Slovak population does not display a decrease in the circumference of annual rings; on the contrary, it rises until the animal reaches the age of 8. The Rab population shows abrupt decrease in this value after age 6, which is the highest decrease among the compared populations. Key words: trophy, horns, mouflon, correlation, horn length, span, C-index, curvature, CIC-points, increase in growth, comparison |