DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
ŠUMARSKI LIST 11-12/2011 str. 28 <-- 28 --> PDF |
Š. Pezdevšek Malovrh, D. G. Hodges, B. Marić, M.Avdibegović: PRIVATE FOREST OWNER EXPECTATIONS ... Šumarski list br. 11–12, CXXXV (2011), 557-566 decision makers were more likely to expect silvicultural advice, as were sole holders. Theharvesting advicemodel (Model 2), indicate that private forest owners with higher levels of education were less likely to expect advice in harvesting, as well as owners who were younger and owned less than 1 ha of forest. Educated and younger people are more likely to live in urban areas, so they do not have specific interests for their forests or advice, such as that associated with forest harvesting (Pezdevšek Malovrh, 2010b ibid). Small-scale forest property owners do not have strong economic interests in managing their forests. Conversely, sole holders were more likely to expect harvesting advice compared to those who share ownership. In these cases, management of private property is less demanding as it does not involve coordination of interest among the joint owners (Pezdevšek Malovrh et. al., 2010aibid). Results of the strengthening entrepreneurship model (Model 5) indicate that owners who actively ma nage their forest were less likely to expect that kind of information from interest associations as were more educated owners. Education is often linked to higher incomes and therefore, fewer expressed entrepreneurship characteristics related to their forests. The same explanation applies tosupport on forest road construction/ maintenance (Model 6), where the owners with higher levels of education (university or more) were less likely to expect such a support from interest associations. Those private forest owners who have consolidated forest property were also less likely to expect support in forest road construction/maintenance, which might be the result of relatively high openness (density of forest roads) of their forests. Table 2. Results of multivariate logistic regression – Bosnia-Herzegovina Tablica 2 Rezultati multivarijantne logističke regresije – Bosna i Hercegovina Variables/Varijable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7 Coefficient/Koeficijent Constant/Konstantan -0,670 --2,753 --38,313 1,447 -1,064 Gender/Pol Male/Muški 1,066 -0,606 -18,570 0,132 -0,248 Female/Ženski 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000 Age/Starost Less than 50/Manje od 50 0,058 --0,110 --0,112 -0,373 0,011 More than 50/Više od 50 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000 Education/Obrazovanje Primary school or less Osnovna škola ili niže 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000 High school/Srednja škola -0,282 -0,399 -0,021 -0,091 0,52 University or more/Fakultet ili više 0,211 -0,386 -0,354 0,132 0,961** Ownership/Vlasništvo Sole holder/Jedan vlasnik 0,532** --0,561** --0,621 -0,516 0,124 Joint owners/Zajedničko vlasništvo 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000 Property size/Veličina posjeda Less than 1 ha/Manje od 1 ha -1,199*** --0,481 --2,196*** -1,739*** -0,898*** More than 1 ha/Više od 1 ha 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000 Fragmentation/Fragmentiranost Consolidate/U jednom komadu 0,481 --0,850** -0,669 0,884** 0,861** Fragmented/Fragmentiran 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000 Harvesting/Sječa Harvest/Sijeku 0,349 -1,896 -18,084 1,382** 0,057 Do not harvest/Ne sijeku 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000 Statistics/Statistika . 2 30,610 15,414 36,908 13,780 32,248 43,077 25,625 p value/p vrijednost 0,000 0,052 0,000 0,088 0,000 0,000 0,001 Observations correctly predicted ( %) Korektno predviđene observacije ( %) 63,4 -67,0 -91,4 82,0 70,2 2 R (Cox & Snell) 0,086 -0,103 -0,091 0,119 0,073 2 R (Nagelkerke) 0,117 -0,143 -0,205 0,194 0,102 **Variables are significant at p<0,05; ***Variables are significant at p<0,001 **Varijable su signifikantne kod p<0,05;***Varijable su signifikantne kod p<0,001 562 |