DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
| ŠUMARSKI LIST 12/1949 str. 31 <-- 31 --> PDF |
raznih pretstavnika u granicama jedne te iste vrste. Ukoliko donekle raspolažemo sa elementima prve kategorije pa ćemo ih u najskorijem vremenu i objelodaniti kao drugi specijalni dio ove rasprave, u toliko su nam siromašna iskustva iz područja komparativnih istraživanja u granicama vrste ah na raznim nalazištima i arealima. Stoga ćemo taj drugi problem spojiti sa gornjim prvim te ćemo u idućoj raspravi i ono malo što znamo, što smo opazili u pogledu mnogih i mnogih odstupanja prouzrokovanih regionalnom ili zonalnom raspodjelom — uklopiti u načelna razmatranja o pojedinim vrstama kao takvim, t. j . vrstama kao nosiocima određenih nasljednih osobina. . ............... ........ . ............. ......... ... ..... ...... ..... ......... ...... ........ ........ .... .. ...... ........ ............. ..... ....... ........ ....... . ............. ............ . :.... ......., .. ... nop ..... ........... ......... . ....... ....... ....... ......, ... ... ..... ........ ............ .......... ..... »....... .. ... .... ..... . ......... ......... .......... ......, a ..... ... ........ ......... ..........., ... ..... .......... ..... .... ........... ......, .. .. ...... ............. .. ........... ........... . ...... na .......... ........... ... ....... ........ . .... .... ..... ........... ........... . .........101...> ...... . ............ ........ . ............ ..... . ......, ... ..... ....... ... .... . 1930-.. ..... . ......... ...... ..... ............... .... .. ............ ..... ... .... ... ..... ... .... ...... ........... ....... . ........... .......- Hbix, ............ ... .... ........ ......... ..1...... . ........, KOTopBie ......... ..... .\ ......., .. ................. 15 ...... .............. ............. ........ .........., ........ ............. .......... ...... .. ........ ........... (.. .. .. ....... ...... . .. ....... .......) ........ ...... ................ ........., .. ........ ...... ......... ... ....... .......1. ........, ........... . ...... ............ ....... ....... . .......! ........... ..... ..... .......... ........ 0,6—0,7, ....... ........ .......... . ............ .... ........ . .......... .............. ........... .. ........ ....... ........ .........! ...... .......... ........... .....1 . ............. ..-..1. ..........., ... ... ........ ............ .. ..........; ......... . ... ... . ..... . ........ ............... ..........1 .......... . ...... ..... ............. .... ..... ... ........ ......... ...... ......... . ........ ............. ... . ............. ......... ... ... ... HHI.IX ........; .......... .........´ .. ... ......... . oömi´ii «.... ......... ...... .........! . ..... ............... .. ................ ....... .......... ........., .. ..... ........... . ..... .......... ......!, THE PRINCIPAL REFLECTIONS ABOUT THE FRUCTIFICATION OF FOREST TREES The Yougoslav Forestry, before the Second World War, was under the influence of the forestry science of Middle Europe and the data of German forestry were also used in Yougoslaviam forestry literature and practice. In such a manner, the German data of the physiological maturity of different kinds of forest trees and of the fructification of forest trees, were used in the Yougoslavian foreetry literature and in the Manuals for the foreistry practice. But as it is known, the forest is ai product of different factors such of the climate, soil etc.. and the data for Germany and for other countries of Middle Europe are not usable in Yougoslavia. In the plan economy it is necessary to have trustworthy data about the fructification of different forest trees for every country. In this article, the author discusses about the principal moments of thi.s problem. Some of these moments are described. The basis for this article are the observations by the autlior, which are executed in the forests of Bosnian Krajina. 413 |