DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
ŠUMARSKI LIST 3-4/1996 str. 45 <-- 45 --> PDF |
Ž. Borzan. M. Idžojtić, H. Gimenberger: STANDARDIZACIJA ISTRAŽIVANJA KARIOTIPOVA ČETINJAČA . Šumarski list br. 3—4, CXX (1996), 121—131 Guttenberger, H., Kohler, B. &Borzan,Z„ 1995: ChroMergen, F. & Bur 1 ey , J., 1964: Abies karyotype analysis. Silmosome banding for identification of the chromosomes of vae Genetica, vol. 13(3), pp. 63-68. Spruce trees. Manuscript. Cytogenetics Working party me eting, IUFRO Congress Tampere, Finland, August 7-13, 1995. Hizume , M., 1988: Karyomorphological studies in the family Pinaceae. Mem. Fac. Educ. Ehime Univ., Nat. Sci., vol. 8, pp. 1-108. Hizume, M., Ohgiku, A.&Tanaka, A., 1983: Chromosome banding in the genus Pinus. I. Identification of chromosomes in Pinus nigra by fluorescent banding method. Bot. Mag. Tokyo, vol. 96, pp. 273-276. 11 c h e n k o , T. P., 1975: Sravnitteljno- kariologicheskoe issledovanie listtvenic primorja. Akademija nauk SSSR, Krasnojarsk. pp. 1-34. lilies , Z. M., 1971: First results on karyological investigations in the endosperm of an aneuploid Larch derived from a C generation of Larix decidua x C0 Larix leptolepis. Ann. Univ. etA.R.E.R.S. vol. 9, pp. 12-15. Kondo, T.&Hizume, M„ 1982: Banding for the chromosomes of Cryptomeria japonica D. Don. J. Jap. For. Soc, vol. 64(9), pp. 356-358. Kondo, T., Hizume, M. &Kubota,R., 1985: Variation of fluorescent chromosome bands of Cryptomeria japonica. J. Jap. For. Soc, vol. 67(5), pp. 184-189. Kohler, B. Guttenberger, H. &Borzan,Ž„ 1995: Karyotype analysis based on female gametophyte of Norway spruce. Forest Genetics, vol. 2(1), pp. 41-48. Levan,A., Fredga K. &Sandberg, A. A., 1964: Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas, vol. 52, pp. 201-220. MacPherson, P. &Filion, W. G. 1981: Karyotype analysis and the distribution of constitutive heterochromatin in five species of Pinus. Hereditas, vol. 72, pp. 193-198. Matern, B. &Simak, M. 1968: Statistical problems in karyotype analysis. Hereditas, vol. 59, pp. 280-288. Muratova , E. N., 1978: Kariotipi kedrovih sosen. I. Kariotip Pinus sibirica Du Tour. Citologija, vol. 20(8), pp. 972-976. Pederick , L. A., 1967: The structure and identification of the chromosomes of Pinus radiata D. Don. Silvae Genetica, vol. 16, pp. 69-77. Pederick , L. A., 1969: The potential of cytogenetic research in Conifer species as indicated by some studies with Pinus radiata. 2nd FAO/IUFRO World Consult. For. Tree Breed., Wash., No FO-FTB-69-8/14, pp. 1-6. Pederick , L. A., 1970: Chromosome relationships between Pinus species. Silvae Genetica, vol. 19, pp. 171-180. Santamour , F. S.Jr.,1960: New chromosome counts in Pinus and Picea. Silvae Genetica, vol. 9, pp. 87-88. Sarkar , P., 1963: Chromosome studies on Pinus species. (Abstract). Canad. J. Genet. Cytol, vol. 5., p. 107. Sax , K.&Sa x H. J., 1933: Chromosome number and morphology in the Conifers. /. Arnold Art., vol. 14, pp. 356-375. Sa y lor , L. C , 1961: A karyotypic analysis of selected species of Pinus. Silvae Genetica 10(3), pp. 77-84. S a y 1 o r, L. C, 1964: Karyotype analysis of Pinus-group Lariciones. Silvae Genetica, vol. 13(6), pp. 165-170. Schlarbaum, S. E. &Tsuchia, T., 1984: The Chromosomes of Cunninghamia konishii, C. lanceolata, and Taiwania cryptomerioides (Taxodiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, vol. 145, pp. 169-181. S i m a k, M., 1966: Karyotype analysis of Larix grijfithiana Carr. Hereditas, vol. 56, pp. 137-141. Tanaka, R.&Hizume M., 1980: C-banding treatment for the chromosomes of some Gymnosperms. Bot. Mag. Tokyo, vol. 93, pp. 167-170. Y i m , K. B., 1963: Karyotype analysis of Pinus rigida. Hereditas, vol. 49, pp. 274-276. SUMMARY: The karyotype analysis of a single Picea omorica (PANČ.) PURK. tree was completed using female gametophyte tissue. Most chromosomes (n=12) were metacentric, but chromosomes IX and XII were submetacentric. The positions of the centromeres of chromosomes X and XI were close to submetacentric, but were classified as metacentric. Some authors, however, could have considered the smallest four chromosomes as submetacentric. This variance among authors in describing karyotypes is problematic when comparisons are made among studies. Based on a review of literature on karyotype analyses of gymnosperms, a standardization for gymnosperm karyotypes is presented. Recommendations for standardization are given including: karyotype analyses using metaphase or anaphase cells, presentations of numerical karyotypes in absolute or relative length, definitions of centromere position, karyotype graphs, and reliability of position and frequency of secondary constrictions. Key words: Picea omorica (PANC.) PURK., Karyotypes, Endosperm in development, Gymnosperms, Centromere nomenclature, Feulgen squash method |