DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
| ŠUMARSKI LIST 9-10/2002 str. 65 <-- 65 --> PDF |
D. fCremer: FENOLOGIJA KASNOPROLJETNOG CVJETANJA NEKIH DRVENASTIH VRSTA Šumarski list br. 9-10. CXXVI (2002). 4S9-499 Giperborej ski, B., 1983: Lespedeza. U: Potočić, lowlands. Subtropicheskie Kul´tury, Georgia Z. (ur.), Šumarska enciklopedija, JLZ Miroslav 5:25-31. Krleža, Zagreb, 2: 340. Panov , A., 1949: Načelna razmatranja o fruktifikaciji Ilijanić, Lj., Sugar, J., Topic, J., Šegulja, N., šumskog drveća. Šum. list 73(12): 407-413. 1974: Proučavanje sezonskih promjena u vegeRegent , B., 1983: Mogranj. U: Potočić, Z. (ur.), Šutaciji Zagrebačke gore u 1972. godini. Ekologija marska enciklopedija, JLZ Miroslav Krleža, Za9( 2): 107-132. greb, 2: 423-424. Jurković , M , 1990: Fenološke karakteristike nekih Starshova, N.P, 1972: The ´anthecology´ of Pheldrvenastih egzota u Zagrebu. Šum. list 114 (6-8): lodendron amurense in the Middle Volga region, 237-249. I. Ecology of flowering. Botanicheskii Zhurnal Jurković , M., 1994: Nove vrste dendroflore intro-57(11): 1402-412. ducirane na području Hrvatske. Šum. list 118 Ungar,S. , 1971: Zapažanja o zimskoj otpornosti bilja (11-12): 237-249. domaćeg i stranog porijekla u zbirkama BotaKaravla , J., 1983: Povijuše. U: Potočić, Z. (ur.), Šuničkog vrta PMF Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Hortimarska enciklopedija, JLZ Miroslav Krleža, Zakultura 3: 68-75. greb, 3: 31. Urbani, N., 1914: Phenološke bilješke. Šum. list 1 Kohmann, K, Johnsen, O., 1994: The timing of (38): 16-20. bud set in seedlings of Picea abies from seed Vidaković, M., 1983a: Clerodendron. U: Potočić, crops of a cool versus a warm spring and sumZ. (ur.), Šumarska enciklopedija, JLZ Miroslav mer. Silvae Genet. 43 (5-6): 329-333. Krleža, Zagreb, 1: 264. Kremer, D., 2001: Fenološka zapažanje cvatnje ne Vidaković , M., 1983b: Hibisk. U: Potočić, Z. (ur.), kih drvenastih vrsta u Botaničkom vrtu Prirodo-Šumarska enciklopedija, JLZ Miroslav Krleža, slovno-matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagreb, 1: 52. Zagrebu. Šum. list 125 (9-10): 476-486. Vrdoljak,Ž. , 1983: Kelreuterija. U: Potočić, Z. (ur.), Kremer , D., 2002: Cvjetanjee nekih drvenastih vrsta Šumarska enciklopedija, JLZ Miroslav Krleža, tijekom zime u Botaničkom vrtu Prirodoslovno- Zagreb, 2: 235. matematičkoga fakulteta U Zagrebu. Šum. list. Yoshino, M., Park-Ono, H. S., Omasa, K.,Kai, 126(5-6). K., Taoda , H., 1996: Variations in the plant Kriissmann , G., 1976-1978: Handbuch der Laubge phenology affected by global warming. Climate holze (I—III). Paul Parey, Berlin und Hamburg. change and plants in East Asia, Springer-Verlag Kukava , A.A., 1988: Flowering biology and proTokyo, Tokyo,93-107. ductivity in some hazel cultivars in the Kolkhida ZAHVALA - Acknowledgement Prof. dr. se. Želimiru Borzanu zahvaljujem na ko- su mi omugućili da obavim istraživanja u Botaničkom risnim savjetima prilikom pisanja ovoga rada, a mr. se. vrtu Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta Sveučilišta Biserki Juretić i mr. se. Mati Jurkoviću zahvaljujem što u Zagrebu. SUMMARY: Phenology of flowering of late spring and summer flowering species was analyzed in the Botanical garden of the Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics University of Zagreb on some species of genus Callicarpa, Campsis, Catalpa, Ceanothus, Clerodendrum, Hibiscus, Indigofera, Koelreuteria, Lespedeza, Punica and Sophora. The time of the beginning, culmination and ending of flowering was recorded during the spring and summer of 1998, 1999 and 2000. We were found out that for some species (Clerodendrum trichotomum, Hibiscus syriacus, Punica granatum, Sophora japonica) we can predict the time of the beginning of flowering, because there was no more significant shift in the time of flowering during three years. For less number of species (Catalpa bignonioides and C. ovata, Koelreuteria paniculata, Lespedeza bicolor) it was found out some bigger shift (about three weeks) in the time of the beginning of flowering among the single years. In the others species (Callicarpa spp., Campsis radicans, Ceanothus spp., Indigofera spp.) it was noticed that the moving as regards the time of flowering was one to two weeks. All species show the most stability according to the time of ending of flowering, according to the time of culmination stability is less, while the time of the beginning of flowering is the most variable. Key words: Phenology, time of flowering, Callicarpa, Campsis, Ceanothus, Catalpa, Clerodendrum, Hibiscus, Indigofera, Koelreuteria, Lespedeza, Punica, Sophora |