DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagoðeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu




ŠUMARSKI LIST 11-12/2006 str. 57     <-- 57 -->        PDF

K. Krapinec, M. Grubešiæ, V. Šegrt, K. Marièiæ: TROFEJNI PARAMETRI MUFLONA . Šumarski list br. 11–12, CXXX (2006), 523-531
mon musimon P.) für die Güteklassenbeurtei-Piegert, H., W. Uloth, 2000: Der Europäische
lung. Z. Jagdwiss., 38: 22–216. Mufflon. 1. Auflage, DSV-Verlag GmbH, Ham


Markov, G., I. Petrov, 1990. Vergleichsanalyse der burg 258 p.
Trophäen des europäischen Mufflons (Ovis am-Regnier, K., 1936: Schneckenformen der Muffelmon
musimon Pallas, 1811). Z. Jagdwiss. 36, widder. Wild und Hund, 42 (35):589–593.


151–159. Sabadoš, K., 1974. Kvatitativny a kvalitativny vývoj


M ol n á r, A., 1988: Morphological characteristics for muflónej zveri na Slovensku. Pol. Zbornik 4.
the mufflon population of the Buda-mountains. Stubbe, C., K. Uhlenhaut, 1970: Kraniologische
Valdbiológia 2, 157–167. Untersuchungen am Harzer Muffelwild – Ovis


Nahlik, A., 1989a: Succes of some recent moufflon ammon musimon (Pallas, 1811). Beiträge zur


populations established in the Transdanubian Jagd-und Wildforschung, 7: 143–156.
mountains on the basis of trophy parameters. Telle, R., 1979: Untersuchungen zu ausgewählten
Vadiológia, 3:102–115. Problemen der Bewirtschaftung des Muffelwil-


Nahlik, A., 1989b: Evaluation of trophy data concerdes
in der DDR. Tharandt, Dissertation.
ning some of our bigger Hungarian moufflon Telle, R., 1984: Wertung ausgewählter Ansprachmerkpopulations.
Erdészeti és Faipari Tudományos male an der Trophäe des Muffelwildes. Waldbio-
Közlemények, 1: 145–186. logie und Wildbewirtschaftung 3. 340–348.
Pfeffer, P., 1967: Le Mouflon de Corse (Ovis ammon Vari æ a k , V., 1997: Ocjenjivanje lovaèkih trofeja; Eumusimon
Schreber, 1782), position systemati-roteam d.o.o.; Zagreb; 176 pp.
que, ecologie et ethologie comparées – Mammalia
(Suppl.), 31, 262 pp.


SUMMARY: The paper analyses the interaction of measuring elements in
mouflon trophies, as well as horn growth in length and circumference, and
compares it with some Central European and Corsican populations. In terms
of mouflon horn element evaluation from the hunting ground “Kalifront”, the
highest correlation with age was displayed horn length (r = 0.83), circumference
in the third horn section
nn (
((r = 83) and the overall trophy value (r =


y v


0.82). The overall trophy value is
ss most affected by horn length (r = 0.98), folr


i n le


lowed by horn circumference in the third horn section (
((r = 0.91). The second
horn section shows slightly less correlation with trophy values and circumference,
or horn span (r = 0.82) and curvature. The curve of horn circumference
increase from the Rab population in the first four years shows great similarity
to the curve of the Slovak population. Together, they have higher values
than other populations. However, unlike the Rab population, the Slovak population
does not display a decrease in the circumference of annual rings; on
the contrary, it rises until the animal reaches the age of 8. The Rab population
shows abrupt decrease in this value after age 6, which is the highest decrease
among the compared populations.


Key words: trophy, horns, mouflon, correlation, horn length, span,
C-index, curvature, CIC-points, increase in growth, comparison