DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu



ŠUMARSKI LIST 11-12/2009 str. 12     <-- 12 -->        PDF

M. Čater, P. Simončič: PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSE OF YOUNG BEECH (Fagus Sylvatica L.) ... Šumarski list br. 11–12, CXXXIII (2009), 569-576


ment, with a long tradition of a sustainable and close-tonature
approach, with a single-tree selection method
(Diaci 2006). In contrast, in the Pohorje complex, with
potential beech sites, Norway spruce has been favored in
the last century and nowadays beech is gradually replacing
spruce either by underplanting or by natural regeneration
(Diaci 2006). In case of the response in
young beech trees, differences in assimilation rate may
reflect not only the different forest management history,
but also a different genetic background.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT – Zahvala


Autors wish to thank dr. Nenad Potočić, from Šumarski
Institut Jastrebarsko, Croatia, forconstructive
suggestions on the manuscript text and revision of titles
and abstract in Croatian language.The article is a result
of the “L4-6232; Carbon dynamic in natural beech forest”
project, financed by the Slovenian Research
Agency and Programme research group.


REFERENCES – Literatura


Anonymous,2007. CE CLRTAPICPonAssessment
and Monitoring ofAir Pollution Effects on Forests
MANUAL on methods and criteria for harmonized
sampling, assessment, monitoring and
analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests,
Part IV, Sampling andAnalysis of Needles and
Leaves, Updated 05/2005 (page 7: 2007);


(http://www.icp-forests.org/pdf/manual4.pdf)
Anonymous, 2003. WinSCANOPY2003b for hemispherical
image analysis, Regent instruments
inc., Manual, 106 p.
Batič, F., 2007.Rastline in podnebne spremembe =
Plants and climate change. In: Jurc, Maja (ed.).


Podnebne spremembe : vpliv na gozd in gozdarstvo
: impact on forest and forestry, (Studia forestalia
Slovenica, št. 130). Ljubljana: Biotehniška
fakulteta, Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive
gozdne vire: = Biotechnical Faculty, Department
of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources
Slovenia, 2007, p. 51–66.


Callaghan, T.V., L.O. Bjorn, Y. Chernov, T.
Chapin, T.R. Christensen, B. Huntley,


R.A.Ims, M.Johansson, D.Jolly, S.Jonasson,
N. Matveyeva, N. Panikov, W.
Oechel, G. Shaver, J. Elster, I.S. Jonsdottir,
K. Laine, K. Taulavuori, E. Taulavuori
& C. Zocker, 2004. Responses to
projected changes in climate and UV-B at the species
level,Ambio, 33, (7), p.418–435.


Davies, W.J., 2006. Responses of plant growth and
functioning to changes in water supply in a changing
climate. In: Plant Growth and Climate
Change, J.I.L. Morison (Ed.), M.D. Morecroft
(Ed.),Wiley-Blackwell, pp 96–117.


Diaci,J., 2006. Fifty years of restoration in norway
spruce replacement forests in Slovenia. In: Simončič,
P. (ed.), Čater, M. (ed.). Splošne ekološke
in gozdnogojitvene osnove za podsadnjo
bukve (Fagus sylvatica L.) v antropogenih smrekovih
sestojih, (Studia forestalia Slovenica, št.


129). Ljubljana: Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije,


Silva Slovenica, 2006, p. 130–141.


Cheng,S.-H., B.D.Moore,J.R.Seemann,1998.
Effects of short- and long-term elevated CO on


2


the expression of Ribulose-1,5 biphosphate carboxylase/
oxygenase genes and carbohydrate accumulation
in leaves ofArabidopsis thaliana (L.)
Heynh. Plant Physiology, 116, p.715–723.


Farquhar,G.D., S. von Caemmerer, and J.A. Berry,
1980. A Biochemical Model of Photosynthetic
CO2 Assimilation in Leaves of C3 species.
Planta149, p. 78–90.


Ghannoum, O., S. von Caemmerer, L.H. Zis ka,
J.P. Conroy,2000. The growth response
of C plants to rising atmospheric CO partial


4 2


pressure: a reassessment. Plant Cell Environm.,
23, p. 931–942.


Hannah,L., J.L. Carr,A. Lankerani, 1995. Human
disturbance and natural habitat: biome level analysis
of a global data set. Biodiv. Conserv. 4, p.
128–155.


Hibberd,J.M., R.Whitbread, J.F.Farrar,1996.
Effect of elevated concentrations of CO on in


2


fection ofbarley byErysiphe graminis. Physiol.
Mol. Plant. Pathol., 48, p. 37–49.


Kazda,M., 1997. Lichtverteilung inWaldbeständen -
Konsequenzen für denWaldbau. Österreichische
Forstzeitung, p. 11–13.


Kimball,B.A., 1993. Effects of increasing atmospheric
CO on vegetation.Vegetatio, 104/105, p.


2


65–83.
Kohen,A.E.L., L. Venet, M. Mousseau, 1993.
Growth and photosynthesis of two deciduous forest
species at elevated carbon dioxide, Functio


nal Ecology, 7, p. 480–486.


Kutnar,L., 2003. Forest vegetation of Slovenia. In:


Intensive monitoring programme in Slovenia