DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu




ŠUMARSKI LIST 11-12/2009 str. 13     <-- 13 -->        PDF

M. Čater, P. Simončič: PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSE OF YOUNG BEECH (Fagus Sylvatica L.) ... Šumarski list br. 11–12, CXXXIII (2009), 569-576


(IMP-SI): basic structural document : project do


cument. Ljubljana: Slovenian Forestry Institute;


Wageningen: Alterra, 2003. p. 21


Kutnar,L., M.Urbančič,2008. Influence of site
and stand conditions on diversity of soil and vegetation
in selected beech and fir-beech forests
in the Kočevje region. Zbornik gozdarstva in lesarstva
80, p. 3–30.


Körner, C., 2006. Significance of temperature in
plant life. In: Plant Growth and Climate Change,


J.I.L. Morison (Ed.), M.D. Morecroft (Ed.),
Wiley-Blackwell, pp 48–69.


Lambers,H., F.S. Chapin,III, T.L. Pons,1998.
Plant Physiological Ecology.- Springer, New
York – Berlin – Heidelberg – Barcelona – Budapest
– Hong Kong – London – Milan – Paris –
Singapore –Tokyo, 550 pp.


Larcher, W., 1995. Physiological plant ecology.Ecophysiology
and stress physiology of functional
groups.-Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 506 p.


Lewis,J.D., X.Z. Wang,K.L.Griffin, D.T.Tissue,
2002. Eeffects of age and ontogeny on
photosynthetic responses of a determinate annual
plant to elevated CO cocentrations. Plant


2


Cell Environm., 25, p. 359–368.
Lloyd,J., G.D. Farquhar,1996. The CO depen


2


dence of photosynthesis, plant growth responses
to elevated atmospheric CO concentrations and


2


their interaction with soil nutrient status. I. Ge


neral Principles and Forest Ecosystems., Funct.


Ecol., 10, p.4–32.


Medlyn,B.E., A.Rey, C.V.M.Barton & M.Forstreuter,
2001.Above-ground growth responses
of forest trees to elevated atmospheric CO


2


concentrations. In:The Impact od Carbon Dio


xide and Other Greenhouse Gases on Forest


Ecosystems (eds D.F. Karnosky, R. Ceulemans,


G.E. Scarascia-Mugnozza & J.L. Innes) CABI
Publishing, NewYork, pp. 127–146.


Poorter,H., 1998. Do slow-growing species and nutrient-
stressed plants respond relatively strongly
to elevated CO? Global Change Biol., 4., p.


2


693–697.
Potočić,N., I.Seletković, M.Čater,T.Ćosić,


M. Šango, M. Vedriš, 2009. Ekofiziološki


odziv suncu izloženih sadnica obične bukve (Fa gus
sylvaticaL.) pri različitim razinama gnojidbe:
Ecophysiological Response of Sun-Exposed
Com mon Beech (Fagus Sylvatica L.) Seedlings
under Different Fertilization Levels. Šumarski
list br. 5–6, p. 289–300.


Stanturf,J.,A., P.Madsen,2002. Restoration concepts
for temperate and boreal forests of North
America andWestern Europe. Plant Biosystems
136, p. 143–158


Takeuchi, Y., M.E. Kubiske, J.G. Isebrands,


K.S.Pregtizer, G.Hendrey, D.F.Karnosky,
2001. Photosynthesis, light and nitrogen
relationships in a young deciduous forest canopy
under open-air CO enrichment. Plant cell Envi


2


ron., 24, p. 1257–1268.
Thompson, G.B., B.G. Drake, 1994. Insects and
fungi on a C sedge and a C grass exposed to


34


ele vated atmospheric CO concentrations in


2


open-top chambers in the field. Plant Cell Environm.,
17, p. 1161–1172.


Urbančič,M., L.Kutnar,2006. Site conditions of
the plot Brička and comparisons with other Sustman
plots. In: Simončič, P. (ed.), Čater, M. (ed.).
Splošne ekološke in gozdnogojitvene osnove za
podsadnjo bukve (Fagus sylvatica L.) v antropogenih
smrekovih sestojih, Studia forestalia Slovenica,
129, Ljubljana, Slovenian Forestry Institute,


p.68–85.
Zerbe,S., 2002. Restoration of natural broad-leaved
woodland in Central Europe on sites with coniferous
forest plantations. For. Ecol. Manage.
167, p. 27–42.
Wagner,S., 1994. Sthrahlungschätzung inWäldern
durch hemisphärische Fotos – Methode undAnwendung,
Berichte des Forschungszentrums
Waldökosysteme, Reihe A, Bd 123, Göttingen,
166 p.
Ziska,L.H., J.A. Bunce,2006. Plant responses to
rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Plant
Growth and Climate Change, J.I.L. Morison


(Ed.), M.D. Morecroft (Ed.), Wiley-Blackwell,
pp 17–47.


SAŽETAK: Glede uočenih promjena u reakciji bukve (Fagus sylvaticaL.) u
odnosu na ekološke promjene, odabrano je pet ploha mlade bukve jednake
starosti na prirodnim staništima, koje su bile jednakomjerno raspoređene na
svjetlosnom gradijentu od zastora odrasle sastojine, šumskog ruba do svjetlosnih
uvjeta na otvorenome. Kriterij za grupiranje bio je neizravni stanišni