DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
ŠUMARSKI LIST 11-12/2009 str. 13 <-- 13 --> PDF |
M. Čater, P. Simončič: PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSE OF YOUNG BEECH (Fagus Sylvatica L.) ... Šumarski list br. 11–12, CXXXIII (2009), 569-576 (IMP-SI): basic structural document : project do cument. Ljubljana: Slovenian Forestry Institute; Wageningen: Alterra, 2003. p. 21 Kutnar,L., M.Urbančič,2008. Influence of site and stand conditions on diversity of soil and vegetation in selected beech and fir-beech forests in the Kočevje region. Zbornik gozdarstva in lesarstva 80, p. 3–30. Körner, C., 2006. Significance of temperature in plant life. In: Plant Growth and Climate Change, J.I.L. Morison (Ed.), M.D. Morecroft (Ed.), Wiley-Blackwell, pp 48–69. Lambers,H., F.S. Chapin,III, T.L. Pons,1998. Plant Physiological Ecology.- Springer, New York – Berlin – Heidelberg – Barcelona – Budapest – Hong Kong – London – Milan – Paris – Singapore –Tokyo, 550 pp. Larcher, W., 1995. Physiological plant ecology.Ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups.-Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 506 p. Lewis,J.D., X.Z. Wang,K.L.Griffin, D.T.Tissue, 2002. Eeffects of age and ontogeny on photosynthetic responses of a determinate annual plant to elevated CO cocentrations. Plant 2 Cell Environm., 25, p. 359–368. Lloyd,J., G.D. Farquhar,1996. The CO depen 2 dence of photosynthesis, plant growth responses to elevated atmospheric CO concentrations and 2 their interaction with soil nutrient status. I. Ge neral Principles and Forest Ecosystems., Funct. Ecol., 10, p.4–32. Medlyn,B.E., A.Rey, C.V.M.Barton & M.Forstreuter, 2001.Above-ground growth responses of forest trees to elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentrations. In:The Impact od Carbon Dio xide and Other Greenhouse Gases on Forest Ecosystems (eds D.F. Karnosky, R. Ceulemans, G.E. Scarascia-Mugnozza & J.L. Innes) CABI Publishing, NewYork, pp. 127–146. Poorter,H., 1998. Do slow-growing species and nutrient- stressed plants respond relatively strongly to elevated CO? Global Change Biol., 4., p. 2 693–697. Potočić,N., I.Seletković, M.Čater,T.Ćosić, M. Šango, M. Vedriš, 2009. Ekofiziološki odziv suncu izloženih sadnica obične bukve (Fa gus sylvaticaL.) pri različitim razinama gnojidbe: Ecophysiological Response of Sun-Exposed Com mon Beech (Fagus Sylvatica L.) Seedlings under Different Fertilization Levels. Šumarski list br. 5–6, p. 289–300. Stanturf,J.,A., P.Madsen,2002. Restoration concepts for temperate and boreal forests of North America andWestern Europe. Plant Biosystems 136, p. 143–158 Takeuchi, Y., M.E. Kubiske, J.G. Isebrands, K.S.Pregtizer, G.Hendrey, D.F.Karnosky, 2001. Photosynthesis, light and nitrogen relationships in a young deciduous forest canopy under open-air CO enrichment. Plant cell Envi 2 ron., 24, p. 1257–1268. Thompson, G.B., B.G. Drake, 1994. Insects and fungi on a C sedge and a C grass exposed to 34 ele vated atmospheric CO concentrations in 2 open-top chambers in the field. Plant Cell Environm., 17, p. 1161–1172. Urbančič,M., L.Kutnar,2006. Site conditions of the plot Brička and comparisons with other Sustman plots. In: Simončič, P. (ed.), Čater, M. (ed.). Splošne ekološke in gozdnogojitvene osnove za podsadnjo bukve (Fagus sylvatica L.) v antropogenih smrekovih sestojih, Studia forestalia Slovenica, 129, Ljubljana, Slovenian Forestry Institute, p.68–85. Zerbe,S., 2002. Restoration of natural broad-leaved woodland in Central Europe on sites with coniferous forest plantations. For. Ecol. Manage. 167, p. 27–42. Wagner,S., 1994. Sthrahlungschätzung inWäldern durch hemisphärische Fotos – Methode undAnwendung, Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Reihe A, Bd 123, Göttingen, 166 p. Ziska,L.H., J.A. Bunce,2006. Plant responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Plant Growth and Climate Change, J.I.L. Morison (Ed.), M.D. Morecroft (Ed.), Wiley-Blackwell, pp 17–47. SAŽETAK: Glede uočenih promjena u reakciji bukve (Fagus sylvaticaL.) u odnosu na ekološke promjene, odabrano je pet ploha mlade bukve jednake starosti na prirodnim staništima, koje su bile jednakomjerno raspoređene na svjetlosnom gradijentu od zastora odrasle sastojine, šumskog ruba do svjetlosnih uvjeta na otvorenome. Kriterij za grupiranje bio je neizravni stanišni |