DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu



ŠUMARSKI LIST 5-6/2010 str. 81     <-- 81 -->        PDF

M. Šporčić, M. Landekić, M.. Lovrić, S. Bogdan, K. Šegotić: VIŠEKRITERIJSKO ODLUČIVANJE ...Šumarski list br. 5–6, CXXXIV (2010), 275-286
jenjeni s namjerom boljega odgovora današnjim izazovima
u gospodarenju šumama. Složenost poslovnog
okruženja, imperativ ekološke prihvatljivosti i poslovne
uspješnosti, uz istovremeno održivo gospodarenje šu-
mama, nalaže potrebu za novim i preciznijim modelima i
tehnikama. Razvojem i primjenom analize omeđivanja
podataka i drugih modela višekriterijskog odlučivanja


LITERATURAAnanda,J., G.Herath,2003:The use ofAnalytic
Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder
preferences into regional forest planning. Forest
Policy and Economics, 5, (1): 13–26.
Bahovec,V., L.Neralić,2001: Relative efficiency
of agricultural production in county districts of
Croatia. Mathematical Communications – Supplement1
(2001), 1: 111–119.
Bogetoft,P., B. J.Thorsen, N.Strange,2003:
Efficiency and merger gains in the Denish Forestry
Extension Service. Forest Science, 49 (4):
585–595.
DavosirPongrac,D., 2006: Efikasnost osiguravajućih
društava u Republici Hrvatskoj. Magistarski
rad, Ekonomski fakultet, Zagreb, str. 1–139 + III.
Diaz-Balteiro,L., A. C. Herruzo, M. Martinez,
J.González-Pachón,2006: Ananalysis
of productive efficiency and innovation
activity using DEA: An application to Spain’s
wood-based industry. Forest Policy and Economics,
vol. 8 (7): 762–773.
Diaz-Balteiro,L., C.Romero,2008: Making forestry
decisions with multiple criteria:Areview
and an assessment. Forest Ecology and Management,
255 (8–9): 3222–3241.
Galanopoulos,K., S. Aggelopoulos, I. Kamenidou,
K.Mattas,2006:Assesing the effects
of managerial and production practices on
the efficiency of commercial pig farming. Agricultural
Systems 88 (2–3): 125–141.
Glass, J.C., D. G. McKillop, G. O’Rourke,
1999:Acost indirect evaluation of productivity
change in UK universities. J ProdAnal 10 (2):
153–75.
Herath,G., T.Prato,2006: Using multi-criteria decision
analysis in natural resource management.
Ashgate publishing, 239 p., Hampshire, England
Hiltunen,V., J.Kangas, J.Pykäläinen,2008:
Voting methods in strategic forest planning – Experiences
from Metsähallitus. Forest Policy and
Economics, 10 (3): 117–127.
Kahraman,C., 2008: Fuzzy multi-criteria decision
making: theory and applications with recent developments.
591 p., Berlin/Heidelberg.


moguće je obogatiti šumarsku znanost i praksu pristupom,
koji bi trebao pridonijeti lakšem analiziranju, planiranju
i predviđanju pri gospodarenju šumama. Općenito
se smatra da višekriterijski modeli u šumarstvu, jednako
kao u mnogim drugim poslovnim sustavima, mogu biti
vrlo snažna podrška planiranju i odlučivanju.


– References
Kajanus,M., J.Kangas, M.Kurttila,2004: The
use of value focused thinking and theA’WOT
hybrid method in tourism management.Tourism
Management, 25 (4): 499–506.
Kangas,J., 1992: Multiple-use planning of forest resources
by using analytic hierarchy process.
Scan. J. For. Res., 7: 259–268.
Kangas,A., J. Kangas, J. Pykalainen,2001:
Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural
resources planning. Silva fenn. 35: 215–227.
Kangas,J., J. Hokkanen,A. Kangas, R. Lahdelma,
P.Salminen,2003: Applyingstochastic
multicriteria acceptability analysis to forest
ecosystem management with both cardinal and
ordinal criteria. For. sci. 49: 928–937.
Kangas,J., A.Kangas,2004: Multicriteria approval
and SMAA-O in natural resource decision
analysis with both cardinal and ordinal criteria.


J.multi-criteria decision anal., 12: 3–15.
Kangas,J., A.Kangas,2005: Multiple criteria decision
support in forest management – the appro ach,
methods applied, and experiences gained.
Forest ecology and management, (207): 133–143.
Kangas,A., J.Kangas, R.Lahdelma,P.Salminen,
2006: Using SMAA-2 method with dependent
uncertainties for strategic forest planning.
Forest Policy and Economics, 9, (2): 113–125.
Kao,C., 1998: Measuring the efficiency of forest districts
with multiple working circles. Journal of
the Operational Research Society, 49: 583–590.
Koksalan, M.M., S.Zionts,2001: Multiple criteria
decision making in the new millennium.
Springer, 478 p., Berlin/Heidelberg.
Krč,J., 1999:Večkriterijalno dinamično vrednotenje
tehnoloških, ekonomskih, socialnih in ekoloških
vplivov na gospodarjenje z gozdovi. Disertacija,
Biotehniška fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani, 174
str. Ljubljana.
Kurttila,M., M.Pesonen, J.Kangas, M.Kajanus,
2000: Utilizing the analytical hierarchy process
(AHP) in SWOT analysis – a hybrid met hod
and its application to a forest certification case.
For. policy econ., 1: 41–52.