DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu



ŠUMARSKI LIST 9-10/2011 str. 51     <-- 51 -->        PDF

M. Stevanov, M. Böcher, M. Krott, S. Orlović, D. Vuletić, S. Krajter: ANALITIČKI MODEL RESORNOGA...Šumarski list br. 9–10, CXXXV (2011), 449-466
2004: Science, Scientists and the Policy Process:ber, 2003, Vienna. Publication Series of the In-
Lessons from Global Environmental Asses-stitute of Forest Sector Policy and Economics –
sments for the Northwest Forest,U: K.Arabas, J.Vol. 52:195–215, Institute for Forest Sector Po-
Bowersox (ur.),Forest Futures: Science, Politicslicy and Economics,Vienna.
and Policy for the next Century, Rowman & Litt


Sarewitz,D., R.A.PielkeJr,2007: Theneglected
lefield, Lanham, MD, str. 95–111.


heart of science policy: reconciling supply of
Moll,P., U.Zander,2006: Managing the Interface,and demand for science,Environ. Sci. Policy,


From knowledge to action in global change and10(1):5–16, Amsterdam.


sustainability science, OekomVerlag, München,


Schimank,U., 2005: Zukunft der Ressortforschung,
160 str.


Izlaganje u Bonnu, 24. 2. 2005.
MRRŠVG RH, 2010: Pravilnik o načinju motrenja


Schnell,R., P. B.Hill, E.Esser,1999: Methoden
oštećenosti šumskih ekosustava,NN 67/2010,


der empirischen Sozialforschung (8.izd.), Olden-
Zagreb.


bourg, München, 548 str.
Müller-Rommel, F.,1984: Sozialwissenschaft-


US Congress, 1990: U.S. Global Change ResearchAct
liche Politikberatung. Probleme und Perspekti


of 1990,USA.
ven,Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 25: 26–39,


Vlada RH, 2006: Strateški okvir za razvoj 2006–2013,


Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Bonn.


Zagreb.
Narodna skupština RS, 2005: Zakon o znanstvenoistra-


Vlada RS, 2006: Strategija razvoja šumarstva,Beo


živačkoj djelatnosti Republike Srbije, Beograd.


grad.
Nassmacher,H., 2004:Politikwissenschaft (5.


Vlada RS, 2010: Nacionalna strategija istraživačko


izd.),Wissenschaftsverlag, Oldenbourg, 544 str.


tehnološkog razvoja,Beograd.
Popper,K., 1972: Objective Knowledge: an evolu-


Weingart, P.,2001: Die Stunde derWahrheit? Vel


tionary approach,Oxford University Press, Ox


brück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist, 397str.


ford, 390 str.


Weingart, P.,2003. Wissenschaftssoziologie,Tran


Pregernig,M., 2004: Linking Knowledge andAc-


script-Verlag, Bielefeld, 176 str.


tion:The Role of Science in NFPProcesses,U:


Weingart,P., J.Lentsch,2008:Wissen – Beraten


P.Glück, J.Voitleithner (ur.),NFPResearch: Its
– Entscheiden. Form und Funktion wissen-
Retrospect and Outlook. Proceedings of the Se


schaftlicher Politikberatung in Deutschland,Vel


minar of COSTAction E19 “National Forest


brück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist, 336str.


Programmes in a European Context”, Septem-


SUMMARY: Many governments express a growing need for having a
science that is “usable”, which means that research results should be useful
for practical application. In Serbia and Croatia current strategies and laws
addressing science and research see public research institutes as organizations
with activities primarily oriented toward public interest, in a way that
policy actors are provided with timely and adequate science-based information.
In this paper we analysed scientific and research activities of public research
Institute of Lowland Forestry and Environment (ILFE) to see whether,
how and to what extent this institution meets the needs of actors in policy processes,
i.e. if it is in line with the requirements of “usable science”. The Model
of departmental research (Böcher i Krott 2010), based on sociology of scientific
knowledge and analytical theory, has been applied on total scientific and
research activities of ILFE. The very Model consists of following spheres: research,
integration, scientific and practical utilisation, whereas production
lines connect them and stay for activities of research projects (Figure 1).


In total 51 research projects of ILFE for the period 2005–2010 have been
analysed (table 1), based on project documentation, as well as semi-structured
questionnaires and interviews with project leaders and management of the
Institutes. Collected information was used in analysis of each project and
graphically presented by production line on the model of departmental research.
This was followed by synthesis and interpretation of the results.