DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu




ŠUMARSKI LIST 9-10/2011 str. 52     <-- 52 -->        PDF

M. Stevanov, M. Böcher, M. Krott, S. Orlović, D. Vuletić, S. Krajter: ANALITIČKI MODELRESORNOGA...Šumarski list br. 9–10, CXXXV (2011), 449-466
Results showed five types of production lines:


(1) Preliminary research, starting in integration sphere, with the idea what
will in the future be relevant for particular actor(s). However most activities
remain in the research sphere, and foster results toward scientific utilization
(Figure 2). In total 15 research projects of ILFE correspond with this type of
production line.
(2) Research stopped in the integration discourse. This production line
also starts in the integration sphere, continues to the research sphere, where
project proposal has been made, but its implementation gets stopped by the
actors in political process, i.e. in the integration sphere (Figure 3). Only three
projects of ILFE correspond with this type of production line.
(3) Research oriented toward practical utilisation, where constant interaction
between research and integration spheres, ends up in practical utilisation
of results (Figure 4). Analysis showed 6 out of 51 projects fall into this group
of typical science-based advising of actors in policy processes.
(4) Research projects oriented toward scientific and practical utilisation,
with the main difference that results are meant not only for practice, but for
the scientific community as well (Figure 5). A group of 18 projects can be presented
by this production line.
(5) Consulting activities of public institutes. In ILFE seven out of 51 projects
can be depicted by this type of production line, for which is typical that
usually entire project is within the integration sphere with outputs in the practical
utilisation discourse.
During the research we were able to present all projects of the ILFE by production
lines on the model of departmental research. There is a strong connection
between ILFE and users of its expertise, with more than half of research
projects having practical application (table 1). There are also im portant consulting
activities going on which confirms importance of their role and quality
of connection with the practise and society.


The model proves to be advantageous over existing evaluation methods,
while it makes transparent all aspects of departmental research, which is useful
for both users of science-based expertise and founders of these institutions.
It also makes a solid base for optimisation and quality management processes
within institutions.


Key words:departmental research, model of departmental research, forestry,
public forest institutes, research activities, production lines, usable
science, public institutes