DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu



ŠUMARSKI LIST 11-12/2011 str. 28     <-- 28 -->        PDF

Š. Pezdevšek Malovrh, D. G. Hodges, B. Marić, M.Avdibegović: PRIVATE FOREST OWNER EXPECTATIONS ... Šumarski list br. 11–12, CXXXV (2011), 557-566


decision makers were more likely to expect silvicultural
advice, as were sole holders.


Theharvesting advicemodel (Model 2), indicate that
private forest owners with higher levels of education
were less likely to expect advice in harvesting, as well as
owners who were younger and owned less than 1 ha of
forest. Educated and younger people are more likely to
live in urban areas, so they do not have specific interests
for their forests or advice, such as that associated with
forest harvesting (Pezdevšek Malovrh, 2010b
ibid). Small-scale forest property owners do not have
strong economic interests in managing their forests.
Conversely, sole holders were more likely to expect harvesting
advice compared to those who share ownership.
In these cases, management of private property is less
demanding as it does not involve coordination of interest
among the joint owners (Pezdevšek Malovrh
et. al., 2010aibid).


Results of the strengthening entrepreneurship
model (Model 5) indicate that owners who actively ma nage
their forest were less likely to expect that kind of
information from interest associations as were more
educated owners. Education is often linked to higher
incomes and therefore, fewer expressed entrepreneurship
characteristics related to their forests. The same
explanation applies tosupport on forest road construction/
maintenance (Model 6), where the owners with
higher levels of education (university or more) were
less likely to expect such a support from interest associations.
Those private forest owners who have consolidated
forest property were also less likely to expect
support in forest road construction/maintenance, which
might be the result of relatively high openness (density
of forest roads) of their forests.


Table 2. Results of multivariate logistic regression – Bosnia-Herzegovina


Tablica 2 Rezultati multivarijantne logističke regresije – Bosna i Hercegovina


Variables/Varijable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7
Coefficient/Koeficijent
Constant/Konstantan -0,670 --2,753 --38,313 1,447 -1,064
Gender/Pol
Male/Muški 1,066 -0,606 -18,570 0,132 -0,248
Female/Ženski 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000
Age/Starost
Less than 50/Manje od 50 0,058 --0,110 --0,112 -0,373 0,011
More than 50/Više od 50 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000
Education/Obrazovanje
Primary school or less
Osnovna škola ili niže 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000
High school/Srednja škola -0,282 -0,399 -0,021 -0,091 0,52
University or more/Fakultet ili više 0,211 -0,386 -0,354 0,132 0,961**
Ownership/Vlasništvo
Sole holder/Jedan vlasnik 0,532** --0,561** --0,621 -0,516 0,124
Joint owners/Zajedničko vlasništvo 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000
Property size/Veličina posjeda
Less than 1 ha/Manje od 1 ha -1,199*** --0,481 --2,196*** -1,739*** -0,898***
More than 1 ha/Više od 1 ha 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000
Fragmentation/Fragmentiranost
Consolidate/U jednom komadu 0,481 --0,850** -0,669 0,884** 0,861**
Fragmented/Fragmentiran 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000
Harvesting/Sječa
Harvest/Sijeku 0,349 -1,896 -18,084 1,382** 0,057
Do not harvest/Ne sijeku 1,000 -1,000 -1,000 1,000 1,000
Statistics/Statistika
.
2
30,610 15,414 36,908 13,780 32,248 43,077 25,625
p value/p vrijednost 0,000 0,052 0,000 0,088 0,000 0,000 0,001
Observations correctly predicted ( %)
Korektno predviđene observacije ( %) 63,4 -67,0 -91,4 82,0 70,2
2
R (Cox & Snell) 0,086 -0,103 -0,091 0,119 0,073
2
R (Nagelkerke) 0,117 -0,143 -0,205 0,194 0,102


**Variables are significant at p<0,05; ***Variables are significant at p<0,001
**Varijable su signifikantne kod p<0,05;***Varijable su signifikantne kod p<0,001


562