DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
ŠUMARSKI LIST 3-4/2013 str. 33 <-- 33 --> PDF |
Mosquera-Losada, M.R., J. McAdam, A. Rigueiro-Rodriguez, 2005: Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management. CABI Publishing, Oxford. Naderer, J., A. Huber, 2004: Landwirtschaftliche Wildhaltung, ein leitfaden. Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Freising. Neupane, R.P., G.P. Thapa, 2001: Impact of agroforestry intervention on soil fertility and farm income under the subsistence farming system of the middle hills, Nepal, Agriculture, ecosystems and environment 84, p. 157–16. Palma, J., A.R. Graves, P.J. Burgess, W. van der Werf, F. Herzog, 2007: Integrating environmental and economic performance to assess modern silvoarable agroforestry in Europe, Ecological economics 63, p. 759–767. Pažek, K., Č. Rozman, A. Borec, J. Turk, D. Majkovič, M. Bavec, F. Bavec, 2006: The use of multi criteria models for decision support on organic farms, Biological agriculture and horticulture 24, p. 73–89. Regulation on organic production and processing of agricultural products, 2010: Official Gazette of Republic of Slovenia, NN. 71/2010 <http://www.uradni-list.si/1/content?id=99747> (Accessed 12 March 2012). Regulation on registers of actual use of agricultural and forest land, 2008: Official Gazette of Republic of Slovenia, NN. 122/2008 <http://www.uradni-list.si/1/content?id=90059> (Accessed 7 March 2012). Riemelmoser, R., A. Riemelmoser, 2006: Dam- & Rotwild im Gehege. Leopold Stocker Verlag, Graz, p. 136. Rigueiro-Rodriguez, A., M. Rois-Diaz, M.R. Mosquera-Losada, 2011: Integrating silvopastoralism and biodiversity conservation. In: Biodiversity, biofuels, agroforestry and conservation agriculture (Lichtfouse, E., ed.), Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht, p. 359–374. Rozman, Č., K. Pažek, M. Bavec, F. Bavec, J. Turk, D. Majkovič, 2006: The multi-criteria analysis of spelt food processing alternatives on small organic farms, Journal of sustainable agriculture 28, p. 159–179. Saaty, T.L., 1980: The analytical hierarchy process, McGraw Hill Co, New York. Saaty, T.L., 2008: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, International journal of services sciences 1, p. 83–98. Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia – SORS, 2012: Territory and climate. <http://www.stat.si/letopis/LetopisVsebina.aspx?poglavje=1&lang=en&leto=2010> (Accessed 29 February 2012). Tamubula, I., J.A. Sinden, 2000: Sustainability and economic efficiency of agroforestry systems in Embu District, Kenya: An application of environmental modeling, Environmental modelling & software 15, p. 13–21. Taškar, S., 2009: The suitability of tree species for Trbovlje fly ash landfill afforestation, Graduation thesis, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources. Tojnko, S., Č. Rozman, T. Unuk, K. Pažek, S. Pamič, 2011: A qualitative multi-attribute model for the multifunctional assessment of "Streuobst stands" in NE Slovenia, Erwerbs-Obstbau 53, p. 157–166. Vangronsveld, J., R. Herzig, N. Weyens, J. Boulet, K. Adriaensen, A. Ruttens, T. Thewys, A. Vassilev, E. Meers, E. Nehnevajova, D. van der Lelie, M. Mench, 2009: Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: Lessons from the field, Environmental science and pollution research 16, p. 765–794. Vindiš, P., B. Muršec, Č. Rozman, F. Čus, 2010: A multi-criteria assessment of energy crops for biogas production, Journal of mechanical engineering 56, p. 63–70. Sažetak: Degradirani krajolici nastaju kao nusprodukt ekonomske, funkcionalne, prostorne i društvene transformacije gradova i regija, a sve to popraćeno obezvređivanju i napuštanju područja (Loures 2009). Prema Gruenewald et al. (2007), uspostavljanje poljoprivredno-šumarskih (agroforestry) sustava može biti održivo rješenje za degradirana zemljišta. Ukoliko je upravljan na održiv način, silvo-pastoralni sustav može povoljno utjecati na bioraznolikost, krajobraz i ruralnu problematiku okolišnih ciljeva kroz niz atributa. To uključuje učinkovito kruženje nutrijenata, ispunjavanje kriterije dobrobiti životinja, zapošljavanje i dohodak, preokret ruralne napuštenosti i stvaranje održivih seoskih zajednica (Mosquera-Losada et al. 2005, Rigueiro-Rodriguez et al. 2011). Interakcije u silvo-pastoralnom sustavu generiraju ekonomske, ekološke i socijalne koristi (De Baets et al. 2007). Znanstvena literatura predlaže različite pristupe za ocjenu poljoprivredno-šumarskih sustava prije odlučivanja u velike investicije (Alavalapati i Mercer 2004, Tojnko et al. 2011). Višekriterijska analiza odlučivanja (MCDA) koristan je metodološki pristup kada se ocjena više varijabli ne može lako pretvoriti u kvantitativne jedinice i na naš konačni cilj utječe više međusobno konkurentskih kriterija (Mendoza i Martins 2006). Osnovni problem u istraživanju je u razvoju sustava koji bi podržao donošenje odluka u odabiru najprikladnijih alternativa, s kombinacijom tehnološko-ekonomskog simulacijskog modela (analiza troškova i koristi (CBA)) i analitički hijerarhijski proces (AHP) višekriterijske analize odlučivanja (Belton i Stewart 2002). U ovom radu razmotrili smo različite scenarije za agroforestry regulaciju degradiranog područja sa silvo-pastoralnim sustavom, koristeći integrirano deterministički i višekriterijski model odlučivanja. Ispitali smo mogućnost za uzgoj divljači, običnog jelena (Cervus elaphus) i jelena lopatara (Dama dama) u ogradi. |