DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu



ŠUMARSKI LIST 11-12/2014 str. 19     <-- 19 -->        PDF

proizvodnje koje bi osiguralo rast konkurentnosti i rast udjela proizvoda veće dodane vrijednosti. Potreba za ulaganjem u podizanje tehnološke razine proizvodnje uočena je i u ranijim strateškim dokumentima (Vlada RH, 2004), ali i znanstvenim radovima (Pirc i ostali, 2010; Vlahinić-Dizdarević i Uršić, 2010). Visokovrijedna osnovica i kvalitetni ljudski resursi svoju punu valorizaciju dobit će podizanjem tehnološke razine proizvodnje, što bi trebalo još više naglasiti multiplikativni potencijal ovoga sektora.
LITERATURA
References
Alavalapati, J.R.R., Adamowicz, W.L.: 1999. Economic importance of forestry-related sectors in the provincial and north-western regional econoy of Alberta. Forestry Chronicle 75 (1):111–119.
Blondel, V. D., Jean-Loup G., Renaud L. and Etienne L., 2008: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, (10), P10008.
Bojnec, Š, Ferto, I. 2014: Forestry industry trade by degree of wood processing in the enlarged European Union countries, Forest Policy and Economics, 01: 31–39.
Botrić, V., 2013: Identifiying Key Sectors in Croatian Economy Based on Input-Output Tables, EIZ Working Papers, No. 1302., Ekonomski institut, Zagreb.
Burrows, L.R., Botha, A.,P., 2013: Explaining the changing input-output multipliers in Soth African: 1980-2010, Paper presented at the Biennial conference oft he Economic Society of South Africa, Bloemfontein.
D’Amours S., Rönnqvist M. and Weintraub, 2008: Using Operational Research for supply chain planning in the forest product industry. Information Systems and Operational Research (INFOR), 46: 265–281.
Dhubhain, A, N., Flechard, M., Moloney, R., O’Connor, D., 2009: Assessing the value of forestry to the Irish economy — An input–output approach, Forest Policy and Economics, 11(1): 50–55.
Dixon, H; Stokes, F.; Nana, G., 2012: Updated manufacturing multipliers from 2010/2011 data, BERL, ref 5219.
Industrijska strategija Republike Hrvatske 2014. – 2020., 2014., Vlada Republike Hrvatske, Ministarstvo gospodarstva, NN 126/2014 Zagreb
Leontief, Wassily, 1986, Input-Output Economics, New York, Oxford University Press.
Luo, J., 2013: Which Industries to Bail Out First in Economic Recession? Ranking US Industrial Sectors by the Power-of-Pull, Economic Systems Research, 25(2):157–169.
McLennan, W, 2006: Information paper: Australian national accounts: Introduction to input-output multipliers, No. 5246.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Miller,R.,E., and Blair, P.D., 2009: Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pirc, A., Motik,A., Moro,M., Posavec,S. i Kopljar, A., 2010: Drvna industrija, 61 (4): 229–238.
Posavec, V., Vuletić, D., 2004: Vision of forestry development in Croatia through national forest policy and strategy, in Forests in Transition II, ed. Jansky, L., Nevenić, R. Tikkanen, I. Pajari, B., United Nations University Office at the United Nations, Tokyo, New York.
Sabadi, R., 2007: Učinci hrvatskog šumarstva i prerade drva na stanje bilance plaćanja, što činimo i što bi se moglo činiti, Šumarski list, 3–4: 137–154.
Strategija razvoja industrijske prerade drva i papira, 2004., Vlada Republike Hrvatske, Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodnoga gospodarstva, NN 114/2004, Zagreb.
Ten Raa, T., 2005: The economics of input-output analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, K.J., Psaltopoulos, D., 1996: Methodological issues in forestry input–output modelling. In: Midmore, P., Harrison-Mayfield, L. (Eds.), Rural Economic Modelling: An Input–Output Approach. CAB International, Wallingford.
Vlahinić-Dizdarević, N., Uršić, V., 2010: Drvno-prerađivački kompleks u Republici Hrvatskoj: swot matrica i projekcije rasta, Poslovna izvrsnost, 4 (1): 63–83., Zagreb.
Summary
Forestry and wood industry are important segments of the Croatian economy. Their importance in this article is quantified using the input-output analysis. Direct and indirect effects, appearing through production chains and intermediate consumption of other industries are assessed. Data shows that there are significant direct and indirect effects of forestry and wood industry. Estimated multipliers exhibit high values; especially the output multiplier in section 20 of NACE classification, namely Wood products, reaching the value of 1.94. This is the highest multiplier among all other industries. This is followed by Forestry, section 02 with the multiplier amounting to 1.77 and Furniture, section 36, with multiplier 1.76. The same conclusions are drawn regarding the gross value added multiplier. In terms of the employment multiplier, direct effect is highest in section Furniture, 5.4.
Overall, wood cluster has an above average value of multiplier in comparison to other industries. However, effects are concentrated in the wood cluster itself, not scattered across the rest of the economy. It makes indirect effects less important for the rest of the Croatian economy. In comparison to other EU NMS, the share of imported inputs in Forestry and wood industry are rather small. As for the structure of value added in Croatia, the share of employee compensation is very high, amounting to 30.9%. It is the highest share among peer