DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu




ŠUMARSKI LIST 1-2/2020 str. 64     <-- 64 -->        PDF

It should be noted that the disadvantage of the methodology is the complexity of assessing
such indicators as the Quality and Soil moisture. The Quality indicator requires additional Tab. 2. measurements, the Soil moisture can be assessed subjectively, which will affect the final result. The next step in our research will be to compare the recreational potential of several urban forests from different geographical areas.
CONCLUSION
ZAKLJUČAK
The method of assessment for recreational potential urban forests was developed in view of easy, simple and common available indicators and useable by one assessor. The authors selected and tested 18 indicators grouped in two domains (visitors’ activities – Recreation, ecological characteristics – Forest) in a case study of “Horský park” forest in Bratislava. The case study in Horsky park tested this new methodology and confirmed the importance of the selected indicators, which enable unbiased assessment of an area in terms of suitability for recreational use. We intend to reaffirm the relevance of methodology by questionnaires in the future.
References
Literatura
Bell, S., L. Tyrväinen, T. Sievänen, U. Pröbstl, M. Simpson, 2007: Outdoor recreation and nature tourism: a European perspective, Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 1(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.12942/lrlr-2007-2
Bertini, M.A., R.R. Rufino, A.T. Fushita, M.I.S. Lima, 2016: Public green areas and urban environmental quality of the city of São Carlos, São Paolo, Brazil, Brazilian Journal of Biology, 76(3): 700-707.
Bottalico, F., G. Chirisi, F. Giannetti, A., De Marco, S. Nocentini, E. Paoletti, F. Salbitano, G. Sanesi, Ch. Serenelli, D. Travaglini, 2016: Air pollution removal by green infrastructures and urban forests in the city of Florence, Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8: 243-251.
Cetin, M., H. Sevik, U. Canturk, C. Cakir, 2018: Evaluation of the recreational potential of Kutahya urban forest, Fresenius Environmental Bulleting, 27: 2629-2634.
Deaková, A., 1998: GIS jako nastroj v územnom manažmente na príklade Horského parku v Bratislave, Diplomová práca, Prírodovedecká fakulta Univerzity Komenského, Bratisalva, 87p.
Durkaya, B., B. Bekci, T. Varol, 2016: Evaluation of Bartin urban forest in terms of carbon storage, oxygen production and recreation, Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 1: 111-119.
Dzhambov, A.M., D.D. Dimitrova, E.D. Dimitrakova, 2014: Association between residential greenness and birth weight: Systematis review and meta-analysis, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(4): 621-629.
Eskandari, S., J.O. Ghadikolaei, 2013: Assessment of Ecotourism Potential of Urban Forest Parks Based on Effective Factors in Outdoor Recreation, A Case Study: Sorkhe Hesar Forest Park, Word Applied Sciences Journal, 27: 950-960.
ESRI, 2011: ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
Fantozzi, F., F. Monaci, T. Blanusa, R. Bargagli, 2015: Spatio-temporal variations of zone and nitrogen dioxide concentrations under urban trees and in a nearby open area, Urban Climate 12: 119-127.
Gusev, N., 2004: Spravochnik lesoustroitelja, VNIILM, Moskva, 328 p.
Helms, J. 1998: The dictionary of forestry, CAB International: the Society of American Foresters, Wallingford, 210p.
Holanská, Z., 1998: Mapovanie flóry, vytvorenie geografickej databázy a návrhy opatrení v procese revitalizácie CHA Horský park, Diplomová práca, Prírodovedecká fakulta Univerzity Komenského, Bratislava, 105 p.
Ivonin, V.M., S.D. Samsonov, 2011: Kriterii i indikatory otsenki rekreatsionnogo potentsiala gornykh lesov severnogo Kavkaza, Melioratsiya i vodnoye khozyaystvo, Moskva, 4: 32-35.
Jackson, L.E., J. Daniel, B. McCorke, A. Sears, K.F. Bush, 2013: Linking ecosystem services and human health: the Eco-Health Relationship Browser, Int J Public Health, 58: 747-755.
Jayasooriya, V.M., A.W.M. Ng, S. Muthukumaran, B.J.C. Perera, 2017: Green infrastructure practices for improvement of urban air quality, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 21: 34-47.
Jim, C.Y., W.Y. Chen, 2006. Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China, Landscape and Urban Planning, 75: 81-96.
Kazanskaya, N.S., S.V. Lanina, N.N. Marfenin, 1977: Rekreacionnye lesa, Lesnaya promyshlennost’, Moskva, , 96 p.
Konijnendijk, C.C., 2003: A decade of urban forestry in Europe, Forest Policy and Economics, 5: 173-186.
Konijnendijk, C., K. Nilsson, T. Randrup, J. Schipperijn, 2005: Urban forests and trees, A reference book, Springer, Berlin, 520 p.
Kutilin, V.A., 2014: Rezul’taty ocenki rekreacionnogo potenciala na primere lesov na OOPT, Problemy rekreacionnyh nasazhdenij, introdukcii i sohraneniya bioraznoobraziya rastitel’nogo mira: 25-27.
Lepeshkin, E., 2007: Estimation of recreational potential of urban forests, SLU, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Alnarp, 40 p.
Maple, L.C., P.F.J. Eagles, H. Rolfe, 2010: Birdwatchers’ specialization characteristics and National Park Tourism Planning, Journal of Ecotourism, 9: 219-238.
Miller, R.W., 1997: Urban forestry: planning and managing urban greenspaces, Second edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 502 p.
Moss, J.L., K.J. Doick, S. Smith, M. Shahrestani, 2018: Influence of evaporative cooling by urban forests on cooling demand in cities, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, (In Press).
Němeček, J., M. Rohošková, J. Macků, J. Vokoun, D. Vavříček, P. Novák, 2011: Taxonomický klasifikační system půd České Republiky, Praha, 95 p.
Nowak, D.J., S. Hirabayashi, M. Doyle, M. McGovern, J. Pasher, 2018: Air pollution removal by urban forests in Canada and its effect on air quality and human health, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29: 40-48.