DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu



ŠUMARSKI LIST 5-6/2020 str. 33     <-- 33 -->        PDF

Blagojević, B., Jonsson, R., Bjorheden, R., Nordstrom, E-M., Lindross, O., 2019: Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in forest operations – an introductional review. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 40(1): 191-205.
Čaklović, L., 2014: Teorija vrednovanja s naglaskom na metodu potencijala. Monografija, SLAP, Zagreb, 615 str.
Diaz-Balteiro, L., Romero, C., 2008: Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria – a review and an assessment. Forest ecology and management 255 (8-9): 3222-3241.
Dodson, E., Coakley, J., Sessions, J., 2006: The Analytic hierarchy process: A tutorial for use in prioritizing forest road investments to minimize environmental effects. International Journal of Forest Engineering 17(2): 51-69.
Ezquerro, M., Pardos, M., Diaz-Balteiro, L., 2016: Operational research techniques used for addressing biodiversity objectives into forest management: An overview. Forests 7(10): 229-247
Field, D.B. 1973: Goal programming for forest management. Forest Science 19 (2): 125-135.
Herath, G., Prato, T., 2006: Using multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management. Ashgate publishing, 256 p., Hampshire, England
Hrvatske komore inženjera šumarstva i drvne tehnologije (HKIŠDT), 2015: Smjernica za izradu Elaborata radilišta za radove u šumarstvu, Zagreb, 10 str.
Hrvatske šume d.o.o., 2013: Osnove gospodarenja za GJ »Bjelovarska Bilogora«
Jazbec, A., Šegotić, K., Motik, D., 2016: Decision making on a product line in furniture industry using survey results, correspondence analysis and AHP. The Business&Management Review 6 (2): 92.
Kahraman, C., 2008: Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: theory and applications with recent developments. 591 p., Berlin/Heidelberg
Kangas, J., 1992: Multiple-use planning of forest resources by using analytic hierarchy process. Scan. J. For. Res., 7: 259-268.
Kangas, J., Kangas, A., 2005: Multiple criteria decision support in forest management – the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained. Forest ecology and management 207 (1-2): 133-143.
Koksalan, M.M., Zionts, S., 2001: Multiple criteria decision making in the new millennium. Springer, 478 p., Berlin/Heidelberg
Lakicevic, M., Srdjevic, B., Velichkov, I., 2018: Combining AHP and Smarter in forestry decision making. Baltic Forestry 24(1):42-49.
Mendoza, G.A., Sprouse, W., 1989: Forest planning and decision making under fuzzy environments: an overview and illustrations. For. sci., 35: 481-502.
Murray, D.M., Gadow, K., 1991: Prioritizing mountain catchment areas. J. environ. manage., 32: 357-366.
Nilsson, H., Nordström E-M., Öhman, K., 2016: Decision support for participatory forest planning ssing AHP and TOPSIS. Forests 7(5):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050100
Obi, O.F., Visser, R., 2018: Including exogenous factors in the evaluation of harvesting crew technical efficiency using a multi-step Data envelopment analysis procedure. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 39(2): 153-162.
Ortiz-Urbina, E., González-Pachón, J., Diaz-Balteiro, L., 2019: Decision-making in forestry: A review of the hybridisation of multiple criteria and group decision-making methods. Forests 10(5): 375.
Pavan, M., Todeschini, R., 2009: Multicriteria decision making methods. Comprehensive chemometrics 1: 591-629.
Posavec, S., 2005: Dinamički modeli utvrđivanja vrijednosti šuma. Disertacija, Šumarski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 134 str.
Posavec, S., Šegotić, K., Čaklović, L., 2006: Selection of biological parameters in evaluation of natural resources. Periodicum biologorum 108 (6): 671-676.
Saaty, T.L., 1977: A scaling method for priorities in hierarhical structures. J.mathemat.psych. 15: 234-281.
Saaty, T.L., 1980: The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sabaei, D., Erkoyuncu, J., Rajkumar, R., 2015: A review if multicriteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery. Procedia CCIRP 37: 30-35.
Sarkis, J., Weinrach, J., 2001: Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate environmently conscious waste treatment technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9 (5): 417-427.
Segura, M., Ray, D., Maroto, C., 2014: Decision support systems for forest management: A comprehensive analysis and assesment. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture 101: 55-67.
Šegotić, K., Šporčić, M., Martinić, I., 2003: The choice of a working method in forest stand thinning. SOR ‹03 Proceedings – The 7th International Symposium on Operational Research in Slovenia, Podčetrtek, Slovenia, September 24-26, 2003., p. 153-159.
Šegotić, K., Šporčić, M., Martinić, I., 2007: Ranking of the mechanisation working units in the forestry of Croatia. SOR ‹07, Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Operational Research, Nova Gorica, Slovenia, September 26-28, 2007., p. 247-251.
Šporčić, M., Landekić, M., Lovrić, M., Martinić, I., 2011: Modeli planiranja i odlučivanja u šumarstvu. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 32(1): 443-456.
Triantaphyllou, E., 2000: Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Kluwer, 288 p., Dordrecht, Netherlands
Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H., Lexer, M.J., 2005: Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 207 (1-2): 157-170
SUMMARY
Decision-making, as a process of selecting some of the alternatives to solve a given problem, in forestry is extremely demanding because of the multiplicity and wide range of criteria involved in the decision-making process. Such interests and criteria cover a number of economic issues, social issues, environmental and ecological issues. The application of different multicriteria decision-making