DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
|ŠUMARSKI LIST 11-12/2020 str. 33 <-- 33 --> PDF|
and root collar diameter, respectively. Increases in shoot and root density after the application of organic amendments have been demonstrated by several researchers (Fuentes et al. 2007; Tabari and Salehi 2009; Marron 2015).
One of the main factors that affect success in afforestation studies is the use of high-quality seedlings. As seen in Table 2, the highest quality seedlings were determined in substrates mixed with sewage sludge. These results indicated that the application of sewage sludge to the substrate sustains its effect on the land also. The substrate aims to maximize the quality of seedlings with minimum input. Results obtained in this study demonstrate that the application of sewage sludge, in a proper ratio, can be an alternative that can help to reduce the amount of high priced peat content in substrates.
This study was undertaken to evaluate (a) the feasibility of reducing the peat content in substrates by replacing it with different amounts of diatomite and sewage sludge for Scots pine seedling (Pinus sylvestris L.) growth and (b) evaluation of the land performance of Scots pine seedlings grown in different substrates. Results obtained from this study have clearly shown that the application of sewage sludge to the substrate is an effective way not only to reduce peat content in the substrate but also to improve seedling quality. As a result of the evaluations made in terms of both seedling morphological characteristics and land performance; the best performance was determined in the 9th (50%P+50%SS) and 3rd (75%SS+25%DE) mixtures. The rates of sewage sludge in these mixtures were 50% and 75%. The main problem in the usage of sewage sludge is heavy metals and soluble salts, which could accumulate in the soil. However, its usage in seedling stage can be an alternative to minimize potential hazards, because of its usage in relatively small amounts.
This study was supported by the Republic of Turkey, General Directorate of Forestry (01.1203.2013-2017).
Aksakal, EL., I. Angin, T. Oztas, 2012: Effects of diatomite on soil physical properties. Catena 88: 1-5.
Aksakal, EL., I. Angin, T. Oztas, 2013: Effects of diatomite on soil consistency limits and soil compactibility. Catena 101: 157-163.
Angin, I., M. Kose, R. Aslantas, 2011: Effect of diatomite on growth of strawberry. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43(1): 573-577.
Angin, I., AV. Yaganoglu, 2009: Application of sewage sludge as a soil physical and chemical amendment. Ekoloji 19(73): 39-47.
Aslantas, R., I. Angin, AO. Kobaza, 2013: Long-term effects of sewage sludge application on sour cherry (Prunus creasus L.). Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 61(1-4): 51-56.
Bramryd, T., 2002. Impact of sewage sludge application on the long-term nutrient balance in acid soils of Scots pine (Pinus Sylvestris, L.) forests. Water Air and Soil Pollution 140(1-4): 381-399.
Cordovil, CMdS., J. Coutinho, M. Goss, F. Cabral, 2005: Potentially mineralizable nitrogen from organic materials applied to a sandy soil: fitting the one-pool exponential model. Soil Use and Management 21: 65-72.
Csaba, I., 1995: Growing medium in hydroculture. Plasticulture 108(4): 45-47.
Dickson, A., AL. Leaf, JF. Hosner, 1960: Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stocks in nurseries. The Forestry Chronicle 36: 10-13.
Epstein, E., 2003: Land application of sewage sludge and biosolids. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. 216 p.
Epstein, E., DB. Keane, JJ. Meisinger, 1978: Mineralization of nitrogen from sewage sludge and sludge compost. Journal of Environmental Quality 7: 217-221.
Fuentes, D., A. Valdecantos, J. Cortina, VR. Vallejo, 2007: Seedling performance in sewage sludge-amended degraded Mediterranean woodlands. Ecological Engineering 31(4): 281-291.
Ge, S., H. Xu, M. Ji, Y. Jiang, 2013: Characteristics of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and C/N ratio in Chinese apple orchards. Open Journal of Soil Science 3: 213-217.
IBM, 2011: IBM Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York.
Ingelmo, F., R. Canet, M.A. Ibañez, F. Pomares, J. García, 1998: Use of MSW compost, dried sewage sludge and other wastes as partial substitutes for peat and soil. Bioresource Technology 63: 123-129.
Ingram, DL., RW. Henley, TH. Yeager, 2003: Growth Media for Container Grown Ornamental Plants (BUL 241). Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. 18 p.
Jayasinghe, GY., Y. Tokashiki, ID. Liyana Arachchi, M. Arakaki, 2010: Sewage sludge sugarcane trash based compost and synthetic aggregates as peat substitutes in containerized media for crop production. Journal of Hazardous Materials 174: 700-706.
Khraisheh, MAM., YS. Al-degs, WAM. Mcminn, 2004: Remediation of wastewater containing heavy metals using raw and modified diatomite. Chemical Engineering Journal 99: 177–184.
Leila, S., M. Mhamed, H. Hermann, K. Mykola, W. Oliver, M. Christin, O. Elena, B. Nadia, 2017: Fertilization value of municipal sewage sludge for Eucalyptus camaldulensis plants. Biotechnology Reports 13: 8-12.
Loeppert, RH., DL. Suarez, 1996: Carbonate and gypsum. In: Sparks, DL. [ed.]: Methods of soil analysis, Part 3, Chemical methods. SSSA Inc., Madison, WI, pp. 437–474.
Marron, N., 2015: Agronomic and environmental effects of land application of residues in short-rotation tree plantations: A literature review. Biomass and Bioenergy 81: 378-400.
Méndez, A., E. Cárdenas-Aguiar, J. Paz-Ferreiro, C. Plaza, G. Gascó, 2017: The effect of sewage sludge biochar on peat-based